HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14952 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava, learned Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by the counsel for the respondents that the writ petition may not be maintainable for the simple reason that the order dated 09.09.2025 which is subject matter of challenge has been passed by Indian Council for Agriculture Research and the original appliction before the Central Administrative Tribunal would be maintainable n view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India; AIR 1997 SC 1125. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner could not dispute the said fact. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with liberty to approach the aforesaid Tribunal. October 13, 2025 A. Prajapati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Mishra, Shri Krishna Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Hridaya Narayan Mishra, Sudhanshu Srivastava (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Deepak Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad