Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102870 (ALL)

SUNIL CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34725/2025 · 2025-10-05

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34725 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing That it is expedient in the interest of justice that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to direct the respondent no.2, Sub Divisional Magistrate Tehsil- Mehnagar, District Azamgarh to decide the case no.197/2013 under section 116 U.P Revenue Code 2006 (Sunil & others Vs. Jhunkhun and others) as well as restoration application n о.Т.202515060504159 (Sahatim Vs Sunil Chauhan), case no.4159 of 2025 which is pending before him, within stipulated period as director by this Hon'ble High Court." 2. It is contended that restoration application is pending in proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is registered as Case No.4159 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.Т.202515060504159). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said restoration application may be decided expeditiously. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon authority concerned to decide the restoration application registered as Case No.4159 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.Т- 202515060504159) which is pending in proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Jeet Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sunil Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. October 6, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 34725 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad