Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102851 (ALL)

NAVIN KUMAR PAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15039/2025 · 2025-10-08

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15039 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Hridaya Narayan Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 5 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to grant benefit of 1st ACP to the petitioner with effect from the date when his juniors has been granted as well as further prayer to direct the respondents authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner regarding grant of 1st ACP to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representation. However, despite representation moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 5 submits that in case petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2; Managing Director, U.P. Cooperative Federation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Mishra, Hari Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hridaya Narayan Mishra Navin Kumar Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Limited (P.C.F.), 32 Station Road, Lucknow within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 9, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 15039 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad