Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10284 (UTT)

SHAMSHAD AHMAD AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/916/2024 · 2025-04-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.916 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.328 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun. 4. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after investigation, the final report has been submitted against all the petitioners on 30.03.2025. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, nothing survives to be decided in the present petition, accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 24.04.2025 Ravi