Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010071332025 2025:GAU-AS:4086 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/191/2025 SRI JAGANNATH KUMAR S/O- LATE PITAMBER KUMAR, R/O- GOTANAGAR, P.O. MALIGAON, P.S. JALUKBARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781011 VERSUS SRI CHETAN KUMAR SHRIVASTAVAAND ORS THE GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY (N.F. RAILWAY), MALIGAON, GUWAHATI, ASSAM 781011. 2:SRI RUPJYOTI PATOWARY AEN OFFICE OF THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM 781011. 3:ULLASH HAZARIKA SSE OFFICE OF THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781011. 4:PRATAP ROY SSE OFFICE OF THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 781011. 5:MANOJ BARMAN CLA OFFICE OF THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM 78101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SALAMUDDIN, MR P J PATAR,MR. K SINGHA Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 04.04.2025 Heard Mr. K. Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner. The instant contempt petition is preferred alleging non-compliance of a direction made in a common Order dated 08.06.2023 passed in the writ petitions, W.P.[C] no. 1838/2022 & W.P.[C] no. 1907/2022. By the common Order dated 08.06.2023, the Court had directed the respondent authorities to carry out a demarcation process in respect of the lands claimed by the petitioners in the two writ petitions. I have perused the contents of the common Order dated 08.06.2023 as well as the pleadings made in this contempt petition where, there is a reference to an incident dated 23.06.2023. Mr. Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the incident occurred on 23.06.2023 was a high-handed action on the part of the respondent Railway authorities. I have heard Mr. Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner at some length. Mr. Singha has submitted that the petitioner will withdraw the instant contempt petition in order to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum against the incident dated 23.06.2023. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Page No.# 3/3 the contempt petition is dismissed, as not pressed. Liberty, however, stands reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum as regards the alleged incident dated 23.06.2023. JUDGE Comparing Assistant