Chegondi Parvathi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/5141/2019 · 2025-07-31
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10284 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10284 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010115622019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5141/2019
Between:
1. CHEGONDI PARVATHI,, W/O. VENKATA APPA RAO, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.8-196, TURANGI VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INDRAPALEM POLICE STATION, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. SRI CHEGONDI VENKATA APPARAO, S/O. PAPA RAO, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO.2-519, ROAD NO.5, ADARSH NAGAR, CHEEDIGA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. SRI CHEGONDI SRINIVAS, S/O. VENKATA APPARAO, R/O. D. NO.2-519, ROAD NO.5,ADARSH NAGAR, CHEEDIGA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2
6. SRI CHEGONDI CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. VENKATA APPARAO, R/O. D. NO.2-519, ROAD NO.5,ADARSH NAGAR, CHEEDIGA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A K KISHORE REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.5141 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No.3 in interfering with the petitioner's personal life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution of India in calling upon the petitioner to the police station on the influence of Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 herein and further the action of the Respondent No.2 in not taking any action against Respondent No.3 on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 03.04.2019 as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, high handed and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to take necessary action against the Respondent No.3 basing on the complaint made by the petitioner dated 03.04.2019…”
2.
Learned counsel representing Sri A.K.Kishore Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 01.08.2025 Pmk
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:5141 OF 2019
Date: 01.08.2025
Pmk