KULSOOMA v. ARUN KUMAR MEHTA AND ORS. (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION / HOME)
CCP(S)/453/2023 · 2025-11-08
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10283 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10283 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 10 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 453/2023 in [SWP 378/2005]
KULSOOMA
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate vice Mr. I. Sofi, Advocate Vs.
ARUN KUMAR MEHTA AND ORS.
(GENERAL ADMINISTRATION / HOME)
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. H. Aman Ali, Dy. AG Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 08.11.2025
Learned counsel for the respondents, M/s H. Aman Ali, Dy. AG and Maha Majeed, assisting counsel, submit that the order has been complied with in letter and spirit and appointment order issued. In view of the submission made, this contempt petition does not survive and is accordingly, closed. However, in case petitioner feels still aggrieved and order has not been complied with, he may seek revival of contempt.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 08.11.2025
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 12.11.2025 10:12