Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102821 (ALL)

DASHRATH LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/14902/2025 · 2025-10-05

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14902 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Mr. Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for respondent-BSA. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to grant the gratuity to the petitioner on his voluntary retirement dated 02.11.2021 from the post of Head Master of Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Unno, Block-Sharshawan, District-Kaushambi, by taking appropriate decision on the application dated 20.05.2025, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representation. However, despite representation moved by the petitioner, no heed has been paid yet. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief as prayed for, however, in case petitioner move fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4; District Basic Education Officer, Kaushambi, within three weeks from today along Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Kumar Mishra, Ramesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harsh Vardhan Gupta Dashrath Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 6, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 14902 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad