Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10282 (KAR)

AALAMELAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/200639/2025 · 2025-06-02

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2776 CRL.P No. 200639 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200639 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. AALAMELAMMA W/O SAMUEL KOMBENAVARU, AGE:54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 12TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, B-BLOCK, LINGARAJPUR, BENGALURU–560084. 2. SUJATHA W/O ANIL SANJEEVAMNUR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE TEACHER, R/O BENEKANHALLI VILLAGE, TQ: SEDAM, DIST: KALABURAGI–585222. 3. ANIL S/O DANIEL SANJEEVAMNUR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HEALTH OFFICER AT VASAVADATTA CEMENT CO., R/O BENEKANHALLI VILLAGE, TQ: SEDAM, DIST: KALABURAGI-585222. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI KEDAR DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH, KALABURAGI DIST WOMEN PS, REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH KALABURAGI–585103. Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2776 CRL.P No. 200639 of 2025 2. MANJULA W/O RAMESH, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O 12TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, B-BLOCK, LINGARAJPUR, BENGALURU, NOW AT R/O BENEKANHALLI VILLAGE, TQ: SEDAM DIST: KALABURAGI-585222. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ARATI PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF THE BNSS, 2023 (UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.02.2025 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KALABURAGI IN C.C.NO.20368/2022 DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 239 OF CR.P.C. AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 323, 504, 506 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2776 CRL.P No. 200639 of 2025 “In the above case the petitioner does not intended to press the petition at this stage. Hence the same may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn. That the Petitioners are intending to file the revision petition before the Hon’ble Sessions Court. Hence the memo” Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9 CT:PK