Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10281 (CHH)

UMA KURRE v. COLLECTOR

WP227/172/2021 · 2025-06-15

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24283 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 172 of 2021 • Uma Kurre W/o Laxmi Prasad Kurre, Aged About 30 Years Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Dagniya, Tehsil Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. Collector Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Smt. Lata Bai Banjare, President Amrika Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samooh, Dagniya, Tehsil Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Smt. Amrika Bai, Secretary, Amrika Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samooh, Dagniya, Tehsil Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Netram Banjare, Sales Man-Govt. Fair Price Shop, Dagniya, Tehsil Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records relating to the case of the Petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari/Mandamus and quash the impugned order dated 09.02.2021 passed by respondent no. 1, Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 and further direct to respondent no. 1 to array/impleaded as a necessary party to petitioner in Case No. 18/B-121/2020-21 pending before respondent no. 1. 10.3 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ and stay the further proceedings of Case No. 18/B-121/2020-21 pending before respondent no. 1 till the pendency of the instant petition. 10.4 Any other relief which Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and cost of the petition. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if cause of action arises. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty stated above. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti