Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-53648-2025
- 1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRM-M-53648-2025 Date of decision: 22.09.2025 VINOD KOHLI ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. C.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition is seeking direction to official respondents to consider representation dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure P-6) filed by petitioner against the private respondents in a time bound manner, upon which no action has been taken and same is still pending.
2. Notice of motion.
3. On the asking of Court, Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and assures that respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar would look into the representation dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure P-6).
4. In view of the above, respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar is directed to look into the representation and decide the same on the basis of threat perception felt by the petitioner and if the threat perception is found to be true then the protection as admissible in law shall be provided. In case, the AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.09.22 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment
CRM-M-53648-2025
- 2-
concerned Commissioner of Police is of the view that no protection is required, then a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner.
5.
Disposed of.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 22.09.2025
JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.09.22 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment