Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102774 (ALL)

SMT. RASHMI TIWARI v. BANK OF BARODA AND 3 OTHERS

A227/12043/2025 · 2025-10-05

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12043 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bareilly to direct the parties to maintain status quo till the disposal of 6C application pending before Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bareilly. to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bareilly to decide the stay 19.4.2024, extension application dated 14.05.2025, 30.07.2025, 07.08.2025 in Original Suit no. 433 of 2024 (Smt. Rashmi Tiwari versus Bank of Baroda and others) pending before Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bareilly within specific period." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that an ex parte injunction was granted to the petitioner directing the parties to maintain status quo till the next date of listing. It has also been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that application for interim injunction is pending consideration and the opposite parties have appeared in the suit before the Court below. Learned counsel prayed that application for interim injunction may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the application for interim injunction is pending, no useful Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishwa Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana Smt. Rashmi Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Bank Of Baroda And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Bareilly to decide the application for interim injunction, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2025 Rishabh A227 No. 12043 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad