BEENU SINGH @ VINAY KUMAR SINGH v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/33644/2024 · 2025-03-20
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41515 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33644 of 2024 Applicant :- Beenu Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhawesh Pratap Singh,Prashant Singh Kachhwaha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet dated 30.03.2017, cognizance/summoning order dated 22.11.2023 and the entire proceedings of Case No.907 of 2019 (State vs. Beenu Singh and Others) arising out of Case Crime No.108 of 2015, under sections 147, 148, 452, 336, 436, 427, 504, 506, 332, 353 I.P.C. and section 3 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Kotwali, District- Fatehpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Fatehpur as well as to stay the further proceedings of abovementioned case.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he is not pressing the application on merits and confined his prayer only to the extent that the present application may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case applicant surrenders before it and apply for bail, his bail application may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) to which
learned counsel for the respondents have no objection.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of one month from today and apply for bail, his bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.
5. However, it is made clear that till one month from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant herein.
Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Saif Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad