HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12101 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.04.2023 by which notice has been issued on the stay application. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that application for interim injunction (6C2 Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Etah to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C2 Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Binod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh, Sanjay Kumar Om Sri Dal Veer Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12101 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad