Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102755 (MAD)

Mr.W.Benyamin and 18 others v. S.Renganathan

CONT P/3967/2024 · 2025-04-15

G Arul Murugan, R Subramanian

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont. P. No.3967 of 2024 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont. P. No.3967 of 2024 1.W.Benyamin 2.B.S.Kathiravan 3.V.Loganathan 4.D.John Thoma 5.C.Ravichandran 6.R.Krishnamoorthy 7.R.Periyasamy 8.G.Balachandar 9.S.Perumal 10.N.Parthasarathy 11.R.Selvam 12.D.Sundaram 13.M.Mohammed Iiyas 14.S.Anbalagan 15.S.P.Devarajan 16.N.P.Gunaseelan 17.S.Puvaneswaran 18.N.Bhuvaneswaran 19.G.Gnanasekaran ... Petitioners versus S.Renganathan, The Director, Institute of Road Transport, Taramani, Chennai - 600 113. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. No.3967 of 2024 judgment passed by this Court dated 30.08.2024 passed in W.A.No.2619 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Kannan For Respondent : Mr.C.Gauthamaraj Standing Counsel O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) Mr.C.Gauthamaraj, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the entire amount, including the interest as directed by the Division Bench, has been paid. 2. Mr.R.Kannan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in the contempt petition, agrees that the entire amount has been settled. 3. Hence, recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 15.04.2025 Speaking order Index : No Neutral Citation : No sri 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. No.3967 of 2024 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. sri Cont. P. No.3967 of 2024 15.04.2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis