CRM-M-539 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (103) PRINCE STATE OF CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. BNSS, 2023 No.63 dated IPC, and S Gurdaspur. 2. investigation levelled by evidence. H Deputy Dist 3. has been ino from the b material has 929-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus PUNJAB. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Raj KumarArya, Advocate Mr. Japjot Singh AAG, Punjab. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been 3, seeking grant of anticipatory d 05.11.2024, registered under Section 4 of POCSO Act, at Learned counsel for the n conducted by a senior office y the complainant were not However, the present FIR was lo trict Attorney (Legal). Learned counsel for the petiti ordinate delay of almost two yea bald allegations made by the s come forth. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53929-2025 Date of Decision:- 26.09.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN e for the petitioner. Mr. Japjot Singh AAG, Punjab. filed under Section 482 of the y bail to the petitioner in FIR Section 376-D and 506 of the Police Station Tibber, District petitioner submits that the er revealed that the allegations supported by any substantial odged solely on the report of the ioner further submits that there ars in lodging the FIR, and apart complainant, no corroborative 1 .09.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents e R e t e s l e e t e MANJU 2025.09.29 11:25 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-539 4. statement o detailed enti 5. statement m allegations h the co-accu blackmailed 6. find it to anticipatory 7. September 2 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 929-2025 Per contra, learned State cou of the prosecutrix under Section ire incident and narrated how she After hearing learned counsel made under Section 164 Cr.P.C have been made not only agains used. The prosecutrix has alle d due to videography recorded by In view of the gravity of the a be a fit case for granting th anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition September 26, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No 2 unsel has placed on record the n 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has e was violated. for the parties and perusing the C. this Court finds that serious st the petitioner but also against eged that she was violated and y both the accused. allegations, this Court does not he extraordinary concession of petition stands dismissed. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 2 e s e s t d t f MANJU 2025.09.29 11:25 I agree to specified portions of this document