Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34025 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the informant in Court today, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Rishabh Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 3. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.253 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Mawana, District- Meerut. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is further submitted that FIR was lodged against the three unknown persons, neither injured nor the first informant has made any allegation against the applicant, the name of applicant came into the statement of co-accused Bilal who has already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.33528 of 2025 vide order dated
26.09.2025. Therefore, he is seeking parity of the order aforesaid. The applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since
26.06.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishabh Shukla, Yogendra Nath Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Farhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and co-accused Bilal who has already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.33528 of 2025 vide order dated 26.09.2025 and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7.
Let the applicant- Farhan involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 7, 2025 Imtiyaz BAIL No. 34025 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad