IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 352 CR No.5 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.04.2025 Surinder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and another ..... Petitioners Versus Satpal Singh and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Hooda, Advocate, for Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J (ORAL) 1. This is a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 29.09.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), whereby, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the petitioners, has been dismissed. 2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the main suit itself has been partly decreed, vide judgment dated 11.02.2025 and thus, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 4. The pending misc. application, if any, shall stand disposed of. (VIKAS BAHL) 28.04.2025 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2025.04.29 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh