Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
132 CWP-28244-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28244-2025
Date of decision: 22.09.2025
Ved Parkash
….Petitioner.
Versus Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar and others
....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY, JUDGE Present:- Mr. Rahi Mehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Senior DAG, Punjab. ..… SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) Challenge in this petition filed by the aggrieved person is to the impugned notice dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) u/s 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act for brevity).
2. From the averments in the petition, it appears that the appropriate remedy for the petitioner would be to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal u/s 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
3. In view of above, without commenting upon the merits, the petition (CWP-28244-2025) stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE
(SANJIV BERRY) 22.09.2025 JUDGE preeti i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No PREETI 2025.09.23 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document