Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10272 (AP)

Malladi Satyanarayana Murthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7124/2020 · 2025-02-17

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010117572020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Malladi Satyanarayana Murthy The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following Sri A.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing Smt. K. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7124/2020 Malladi Satyanarayana Murthy AND Andhra Pradesh and others ... Counsel for the Petitioner: K Jyothi Prasad Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Land Acquisition (AP) The Court made the following order: Sri A.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing Smt. K. earned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...Petitioner ...Respondents GP for Land Acquisition (AP) Sri A.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing Smt. K.Jyothi submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand ______________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA BSK 01 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7124/2020 Date: 17.02.2025 BSK