CONSTABLE VIVEK KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14932/2025 · 2025-10-12
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102683 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102683 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14932 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Sheel Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anoop Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents.
2. Prayer in the present petition is for consideration of the claim of the writ petitioenr while considering the represetnation dated 05.05.2025 for transferring the writ petitioner who is posted as Head Clerk Police Office, Ballia to commissionarate Gautambuddh Nagar, District Bulandshahar and District Saharanpur.
3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner shall be considered by second respondent, Additional Director General of Police establishment Police Headquarter, U.P., Lucknow.
4. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same.
5. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order.
6. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manju Shukla/Ojha, Sheel Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Constable Vivek Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case.
7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 13, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 14932 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad