Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10265 (PNJ)

RAM TEJ SINGH v. MUKHTIAR SINGH & ORS

COCP/1920/2014 · 2025-05-20

Alok Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1920 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (202/3) RAM TEJ SINGH MUKHTIAR SINGH CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN 1. that despite best efforts, 2. Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, respondent- passed in RSA 3. instructions, default with liberty to application for any cogent cause of action survives 4. 20.05.2025 Parul 1920-2014 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RAM TEJ SINGH Versus MUKHTIAR SINGH AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Tarunveer Vashishth, Advocate with Mr. Kanwar Pal Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of that despite best efforts, he has not been able to contact Apparently, the present contempt petition Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, contemnors for violating the interim order dated 09.03.2004 in RSA-330-2002. Since the counsel for the instructions, therefore, the present contempt petition with liberty to the petitioner or his application for its revival within a period of cause of action survives. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1920-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 20.05.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Tarunveer Vashishth, Advocate with , Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits has not been able to contact with his client. contempt petition has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for punishing the for violating the interim order dated 09.03.2004 Since the counsel for the petitioner is not having any contempt petition stands dismissed in his LRs to move an appropriate a period of six months from today, in case, All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No 1 (O&M) .2025 submits has been filed under for punishing the for violating the interim order dated 09.03.2004 any in to move an appropriate , PARUL 2025.05.22 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document