Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 55/2025, CM APPL. 9786/2025, CM APPL. 9787/2025
KAMAL KISHORE AGGARWAL
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ronak Gupta, Adv.
versus
SH. DINESH DAYAL & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Baweja, Mr. Piyush Yadav, Ms. Anjali Gupta, Ms. Poonam Kandari, Advs.
+ RC.REV. 56/2025, CM APPL. 9893/2025, CM APPL. 9894/2025
SATISH KUMAR AGGARWAL
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ronak Gupta, Adv.
versus
SH. DINESH DAYAL & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Baweja, Mr. Piyush Yadav, Ms. Anjali Gupta, Ms. Poonam Kandari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R %
25.02.2025
1.
Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the possession of the subject premises has already been taken by the Respondents through execution proceedings.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Respondents, thus, submits that since the possession of the subject premises has been restored, nothing further This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2025 at 12:29:02
survives in the present Petitions and the Petitions have become infructuous.
3. In this regard, reliance is placed upon the judgment passed by this Court in Ashok Gupta v. Deepak Rao1, which has relied upon the Judgments of the Supreme Court in NC Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana2 and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma3. This Court is supported in its view by judgments passed by Coordinate Benches of this Court including Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons v. Ajay Khurana4, Neelam Sharma v. Ekant Rekhan5, and Bhawani Shankar v Nand Lal and Ors.6.
4. In addition, it is contended that the Petitioners/tenants are adequately protected in terms of Section 19(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
5.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present Petitions.
6. The present Petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending Applications stand closed.
7. The parties shall act based on a digitally signed copy of the order.
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J FEBRUARY 25, 2025/jn
1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7148 2 (2003) 1 SCC 453 3 Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008 dated 19.08.2008 4 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5228 5 2019 SCC Online Del 6487 6 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4284 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2025 at 12:29:02