MANISH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/22339/2025 · 2025-09-25
Santosh Rai, Siddharth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102577 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102577 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22339 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kaushlendra, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and the A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 04.09.2025 registered as Case Crime No.0123 of 2025, under Sections 420 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Khiri, District Prayagraj.
3. We have perused the FIR, which prima facie discloses cognizable offences against the petitioner and therefore, the prayer made to quash the FIR cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, we are of the view that no interference is warranted.
4. However, considering the fact that all the offences, complained of in the impugned FIR, are punishable with a term up to seven years, therefore, in case of effecting the arrest of the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned FIR, it is directed that the respondents/ authorities shall ensure that the specific provisions contained in Section 41(1)(b) and Section 41-A of Cr.P.C./Section 35(3) to 35(7) of Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the guidelines issued by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as the directions issued in judgement and order dated 28.01.2021 of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others) reported in 2021 (2) ACR 1147, be strictly complied with. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiraj Singh, Ragvendra Singh Rathour Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Kaushlendra Manish Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 Asha CRLP No. 22339 of 2025 2 (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad