HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34511 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Kumr Pal, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not issuing character certificate to her. In this respect, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District Maharajganj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. October 10, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Pandey, Randhir Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Malti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad