HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34533 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus/Commanding/ Directing the respondent No.2/-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur to take the appropriate decision on the applications dated 25.4.2022, 15.5.2024 and 25.4.2025 of the petitioner which has been filed under 24 U.P.Revenue Code 2006 with regard to Bhamidhari Land on the basis of Halka Lekhpal Report Hated 27.5.2022, (Annexure No.4 to this Writ petition) within stipulated period may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court during the pendeny of the writ petition. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus/Commonding/ Directing the Respondent no.2/Up Ziladhikari, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur to compliance the Partition suit order dated 25.10.2011 passed in Case No. 548 of 1992 Anterget Section 176 Zamidhari Vinas Adhiniyam (Purshottam Lal Vs. Vipin Bihari Lal and others, Paitrik Property/Bhumidhari Land at Situated in Village Nibi, Tappa-84, Pargana Kantit, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur within stipulated period may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court during the pendeny of the writ petition." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, is pending consideration before the respondent no. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction to the respondent no. 2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur to conclude the proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 6, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mithilesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Shiv Narain Srivastava And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad