BACHAN LAL AND ANR. v. STATE TH. REVENUE DEPTT. AND ORS.
CONOW/13/2015 · 2025-12-15
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10254 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10254 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CONOW No. 13/2015 in OWP No. 379/2002
Bachan Lal and Anr. .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s State of J & K & Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. K.L. Bhat, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 15.12.2025
For the last three consecutive dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to cause appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest to pursue this petition. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 15.12.2025 Manik Sr. No. 66