HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5926 of 2025 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A. and also perused the record. 2. Under challenge is the impugned judgment and order dated 02.08.2025, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Fatehabad 2nd Agra in Complaint No 1467 of 2023, (Anil Sharma versus Mayarani), under Section 138 NI Act, whereby the learned court allowed the application under section 143A NI Act of the Opp. Party No.2 and directed the revisionist to pay 10 percent of Rs.20,00,000/-. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the revisionist is that learned counsel for the revisionist did not issue any cheque as there are two reasons; one is funds insufficient and another is signature is different. 4. Considering the entire facts and the submission of the revisionist that the signature is different, but another reason insufficient funds is also therein. Hence the revisionist is directed to pay 5% of the aforesaid cheque amount within one month from today. 5. With these modification, the revision is finally disposed of. October 10, 2025 M. Tarik Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Manish Kumar Kashyap, V.P. Singh Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Abdul Shahid,J.) Mayarani .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD TARIK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad