Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102537 (ALL)

SMT. MEENA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34487/2025 · 2025-09-25

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34487 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live- in life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.83 of 2025, under Section 87 BNS, Police Station- Jasrathpur, District- Etah, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 26, 2025 Saif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Rathore, Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Meena And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad