Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102521 (ALL)

MAJAHARUNNISHA v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/34578/2025 · 2025-10-05

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34578 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. October 6, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bharat Singh Pal, Pratima Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Majaharunnisha .....Petitioner(s) The State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad