Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10252 (JHR)

UDELINE VENTURES INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY ALOK TALUKDAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, RANCHI

WPC/2542/2025 · 2025-07-24

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:20325) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2542 of 2025 .... Udeline Ventures India Pvt. Ltd. Registered office at Tushar Ward No.2, Laldarwza, P.O.- Munger, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Munger, Bihar through its Executive Director Alok Talukar, aged about 55 years, son of Late Radha Ballabh Talukdar, resident of 159, Sevayan Gali, Subash Nagar, Neelam Road, P.O.-Munger, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist.-Munger, Bihar .… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Ranchi, office at 1st Floor, Project Building, P.O.+P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, having its office at Collectorate Building, P.O. & P.S.-Chatra, District-Chatra, Jharkhand 3. District Sub-Registrar, Chatra, P.O. & P.S.-Chatra, District-Chatra, Jharkhand 4. Surendra Prasad, aged about 66 years, son of Dashrath Singh, resident of Hiring, P.O.- Shaligram ram Narayanpur, P.S.-Hunterganj, Dist.-Chatra, Jharkhand 5. Amrendra Singh, aged about 55 years, son of Dashrath Singh, resident of Hiring, P.O.- Shaligram ram Narayanpur, P.S.-Hunterganj, Dist.-Chatra, Jharkhand 6. Atul Prasad, aged about 76 years son of Late Harihar Singh, resident of Hiring, P.O.- Shaligram ram Narayanpur, P.S.-Hunterganj, Dist.-Chatra, Jharkhand 7. Ajit Kumar Singh, aged about 48 years son of Late Harihar Singh, resident of Hiring, P.O.-Shaligram ram Narayanpur, P.S.-Hunterganj, Dist.-Chatra, Jharkhand 8. Sarwajit Singh, aged about 40 years son of Shankar Singh, resident of Hiring, P.O.- Shaligram ram Narayanpur, P.S.-Hunterganj, Dist.-Chatra, Jharkhand .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Adv. For the State : AC to AG .... 02/24.07.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “i. a. For issuance of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction upon the respondents, to take immediate action for the cancellation of the subsequent registered deed dated 05.12.2024, and to ensure that no further transactions related to the subject property are executed without resolving the existing dispute. b. For issuance of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the concerned authority to take appropriate action in accordance with the law regarding the fraudulent execution of the registered deed dated 05.12.2024 (Annexure-2), and to cancel or rectify the same in light of the prior existing registered lease agreement dated 11.07.2023. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy before the appropriate authority as has been provided under the law. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded