.. _` lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMA r/ WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MAR . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .'PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.I 2493 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. E. Raghunath, S/o. E. Kishtappa, Aged about 32 years, R/o.1-86,104- Basapuram Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool Distrl-ct. 2. EnugulaAdivesh, S/o. Satyanarayana (shown in FIR as Satyanna), Aged about 35 years, R/o.1-1,104-Basapuram Village, Adoni MandaI, Kurnool District. .I.Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Statl'on House Officer, AdonI- I town Police Station, KurnooI District, through its public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent Petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS, is filed prayI-ng that in the circumstances stated I'n the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criml'naIPetition, the HI'gh Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners on baI'' in COnneCtI'On With FIR No.18/2025, dated ll-02-2025 in Adonl' I town Police station, KurnooI District. The petition coming on for hearl'ng, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Advocate for the petl-tioners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent. The Court made the following: APHCO10117392025 Jr IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2493/2025 Between : E. Raghunath, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT counsel for the petitioner/accused(S): 1.SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI counsel for the Respondent/comP[ainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Coult made the fo][OWing: This Criminal Petition under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the petitioners herein/Al and A2, seeking regular bail in crime No.18 of 2025 of Adoni I Town Police Station, Kurnool District registered for the offence punishable under Sections 308(2) and 351(2) read with 3(5) of the BNS. 2. The case of the prosecution, 'ln brief, iS thatOn 12.02.2025, the de facto complainant filed a report before the POliCe Stating that the accused pushed pc-3858 w'lth one hand and Struck him With the Other. As a result, PC-3858 fell down and sustained swelling injuries On his left wrist. Meanwhile, PC-3464 attempted to intervene, but the accused also pushed him, causing him to fall onto a motorcycle. Afterward, the accused absconded from the scene. 3. Heard. Perused the material on record. -`c= .v-__d'9 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners were arrested on 17.02.2O25, based on the crime regI'Stered against them. He further submits that the father of Al filed an application I-n CrI.M.P.No.139 of 2025 before the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of FI'rSt Class, Adoni, requestl'ng the appointment of an advocate commI'SSiOner tO Search for accused Nos. 1 and 2 at the Adoni I Town Police Station. The grievance of the petitioners is that in crl.M.P.No.139 of 2025, the complainant falsely implicated them and registered a false case against them. Based on the sal'd complaint, without prior notice, they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.02.2025. 5. Based on the contents of the petition, the learned Magistrate appointed an Advocate Commissioner on 14.02.2025. The report of the Advocate Commissioner indicates that, pursuant to the warrant, he Proceeded tO the COurt and reached the Adoni I Town Police Station. Upon disembarking from his vehicle, the police constables transferred Al and A2 onto a motorcycle. The Advocate Commissioner, along with the learned counsel for the petitioners, then took photographs of the Petitioners While they were with the police. The accusation against the petitioners is that they demanded Rs. 50,00,000/- from the defacto complainant. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is very difficult to believe, in the light of the facts to make such a huge demand. {-------- Jfy 6. Considering the nature Of the allegations and the possibility Of making such accusations cannot be ruled out and in the said facts of the case any further detention of the petitioners is not required and hence, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners herein with the following cond'ltions: i. The petitioners herein/Al and A2 shall be released on bail on their executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two (02) sureties for a like sum each tO the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Adoni. ii. The petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed- sD/_a,CHIT ASSISTAN AS SECTION JOSEPH GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER ii= To, 1. The I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Adoni, Kurnool, KurnooI District. 2. The Superintendent, Adoni Sub Jail, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Station House Officer, Adoni I town Police Station, Kurnool District. 4. One CC to Sri. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRl, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. One spare COPY HIGH COURT TMR, J DATED: 19/03/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2493 of 2025 ALLOWED