BHOORA KHAN AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/37931/2025 · 2025-09-25
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37931 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Sri Zafeer Ahmad, learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. on behalf of the State. 2. This application has been preferred for quashing the charge sheet dated 5.4.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 22.5.2024 passed by learned Additional Session Judge (Gangster Act) Court no. 3, Rampur whereby learned Sessions Judge, summoned the applicants for the offence under Section 3(1) of U.P.Gangster and Anti-Social (Prevention) Act, 1986 as well as entire proceeding of Special Case no. 49 of 2024 (State vs. Bhoora Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 199 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the proceeding under the Gangster Act has been initiated against applicant on the basis of solitary case bearing Case Crime No.125 of 2023, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, Police Station Shahzad Nagar, District Rampur wherein on the basis of compromise, applicants have already been acquitted by learned trial court vide order dated 7.1.2025, copy of which is annexed as Annexure no. 6 to the affidavit. Learned counsel for applicants further submitted that once in the base case, proceeding has already been quashed/applicants have been acquitted, the instant proceeding under the Gangster Act cannot be drawn. In support of his submission, learned counsel for applicants has placed reliance on the judgement passed by the Apex Court in Farhana vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others [2024 0 INSC 118] and stated that once the base case is already quashed, the impugned proceeding cannot go on under the Gangster Act and the entire process is unsustainable and liable to be set aside. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Zafeer Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bhoora Khan And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5.
After having the rival contentions raised by learned counsel for parties, it is crystal clear that base case depicted in the gang chart has already been quashed and once the proceedings of the base cases depicted in the gang chart are quashed or the accused have been acquitted, the proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act are liable to be quashed [Ref: Farhana (supra) rendered by Hon'ble the Apex Court, Salim @ Piyaoo Vs. State of U.P. rendered by this Court in Criminal Revision No. 2541 of 2011, Jai Prakash and others Vs. State of U.P. rendered by this Court in Criminal Revision No. 3309 of 2008 and Sartaj Vs. State of U.P. rendered by this Court in Appl. U/S 482 No.11645 of 2007]. 6. In wake of the preceding discussion, since in base case applicants have been acquitted, entire proceedings of Special Case no. 49 of 2024 (State vs. Bhoora Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 199 of 2023, PS- Shahzad Nagar, District Rampur are hereby quashed only in pursuance of applicants namely Bhoora Khan, Babu Khan, Guddu Khan, Azmil Khan, Aleem Khan and Aslam Khan. 7. The present application is, accordingly, allowed. 8. However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities concerned to initiate fresh proceedings in pursuance of any other case against the applicants herein. September 26, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 37931 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad