HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35098 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. Heard Sri Ramashankar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent to restrain the private person from interfering with the possession of the petitioner. In the considered view of the Court, if petitioner is aggrieved by action in the nature of interference over the land of the petitoner by private persons, he can always raise his grievance before appropriate forum by way of common law remedy, if so advised. Hence, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter. However, liberty rests with the petitioner to recourse to common law remedy, if so advised. Petition is consigned to records with the aforesaid liberty. October 7, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramashankar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. ( Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Simirta Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad