2025:HHC:20040 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 4424 of 2025. Decided on : 26.06.2025 Sudhir Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General, on instruction, informs the Court that the Authority has already taken steps to decide the representation filed by the petitioner, in compliance to the order passed by this Court, in the earlier writ petition, filed by the petitioner. 2. In the light of the statement, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the observation that let the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:20040 representation filed by the petitioner be decided, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight weeks from today, by adhering to the principles of natural justice. Till the decision of the representation, no demolition in terms of order dated 18.03.2025, shall be carried, which order shall be kept in abeyance by the Authority concerned. 3. It is further observed that in case, the representation is decided against the petitioner then also, demolition activity will not be carried for a period of three weeks, as from the date of passing of the order in the representation, to enable the petitioner to have access to such remedy, as he may like, against the order passed by the Authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 26, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)