RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH COLLECTOR DEHRADUN
WPMS/1816/2015 · 2025-01-07
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1025 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1025 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:210 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.1816 of 2015 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate, holding brief of Mrs. Shruti Joshi Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. Himanshu Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent no.3.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous, in view of subsequent developments.
3 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
07.01.2025 Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c04853654 45e3a20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454 C5109CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.01.08 10:37:26 +05'30'
2025:UHC:210