Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 102491 (ALL)

AKASH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15634/2024 · 2025-01-10

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:6121 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15634 of 2024 Petitioner :- Akash Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or appropriate direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to declare the additional result of the selected candidates with reference to the unfilled vacancies under the Horizontal category in pursuance of the Advertisement dated 17.06.2016 for the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police), Platoon Commander (PAC) and Fire Service Second Officer, within the period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court. b). Issue a writ, order or appropriate direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to utilize the petitioners for the purpose of filling unfilled vacancies covered by the selection in question. c). Issue a writ, order or appropriate direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to appoint the petitioners on the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police), Platoon Commander (PAC) and Fire Service Second Officer against the unfilled vacancies under the Horizontal category by the petitioners. d) Issue a writ, order or direction in the matter of mandamus commanding the respondent No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioners." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of their grievance, petitioners have filed representation before respondent No. 2, but no decision has been taken till date. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation within a stipulated time. 4.Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that petitioners may be directed to file fresh representation before respondent No.2. He further submitted that in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No.2 within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of six weeks thereafter. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No.2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 10.1.2025 Amit Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad