Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10249 (KAR)

C V KOTE4SHWASR RAO v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/201106/2025 · 2025-04-21

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2391 WP No. 201106 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.201106 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: C. V. KOTESHWAR RAO S/O C.V.RAMACHANDRA RAO, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KODAMBAL VILLAGE, CHITGUPPA TALUKA, BIDAR DISTRICT - 585 412. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH R. BELAMGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR CHITGUPPA TALUKA, BIDAR DISTRICT- 585 412. 3. SMT. MANEMMA W/O LATE MANIKAPPA AMBALGI, AGED ABOUT: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: VILLAGE KODAMBAL, TQ: HUMNABAD, DISTRICT: BIDAR – 585 412. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2) Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2391 WP No. 201106 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION FILED IS UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION TO RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.11.2022 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 MUTATED THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER TO THE EXTENT OF 02 ACRES 20 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.78/1 SITUATED AT KODAMBAL VILLAGE, CHITGUPPA TALUKA, DISTRICT BIDAR IN PURSUANCE OF THE REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 11.02.2009 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Heard Sri.Santosh R.Belamgi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate who represents respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that petitioner purchased 02 acres 20 guntas of land which is located in Sy.No.78/1 of Kodambal village, Humnabad Taluk, Bidar District. The petitioner thereafter gave a representation to respondent No.2, Tahasildar, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2391 WP No. 201106 of 2025 Chitguppa Taluk requesting him to effect mutation in his name in respect of the subject property. However, said representation is kept pending without any response and therefore, the present writ petition is filed. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate states that the representation of the petitioner dated 08.11.2022 will be considered. 4. No reason is stated as to why the representation is kept pending without giving any reply for more than two years. Therefore, this Court considers desirable to allow the writ petition. 5. Thus, the writ petition is allowed with the following: ORDER i. A mandamus is issued to respondent No.2 Tahasildar, Chitguppa Taluk to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.11.2022 and give appropriate reply - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2391 WP No. 201106 of 2025 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. ii. The decision taken in respect of subject issue be communicated to the petitioner. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 CT:NI