DR. TAUSIF AHMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/37905/2025 · 2025-09-23
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102453 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 102453 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37905 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred to quash the impugned charge- sheet dated 03.06.2023 as well as summoning/cognizance order dated 03.10.2023 including the entire proceedings of Case No. 596 of 2023 (State vs. Dr. Tausif Ahmad Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime No.146 of 2023, under Section 420, 120-B I.P.C., Section 15(2), 15(3) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Police Station-Nakhasa, District- Sambhal, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi. 3. While challenging the entire proceedings of the said case along with impugned chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 has already been repealed on 25.09.2020 and replaced by National Medical Commission Act, 2019 in spite of that, FIR was lodged on 19.04.2023 in the repealed Act wherein chargesheet was also submitted on dated 03.06.2023 in the repealed Act and moreso, learned court concerned also took cognizance of offence under the repealed Act on dated 03.10.2023 and, once any specific Act has been repealed, the process for continuing the prosecution against the applicant become redundant. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer as made in the application but did not dispute the legal grounds as raised by learned counsel for applicant. 5. After having the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dr. Tausif Ahmad Khan And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the legal arguments which have been raised by learned counsel for applicant, seem to be justified since Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 wherein cognizance of offence has taken, has already been repealed on 25.09.2020 and replaced by National Medical Commission Act, 2019 and as such, any action or cognizance taken under the repealed 1956 Act is indeed void. In sofar as attraction of Section 420, 120-B IPC is concerned, the same has been fastened upon the applicant in connection with the offence of said Special Act. 6.
In view of the aforesaid discussions, impugned charge-sheet dated 03.06.2023 as well as summoning/cognizance order dated 03.10.2023 including the entire proceedings of Case No. 596 of 2023 (State vs. Dr. Tausif Ahmad Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime No.146 of 2023, under Section 420, 120-B I.P.C., Section 15(2), 15(3) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Police Station-Nakhasa, District- Sambhal, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi, are hereby quashed. 7. The instant application stands allowed, accordingly. 8. However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the competent authority to re-initiate the matter against applicant, if so required, in strict consonance of the procedure as discussed above. September 24, 2025 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 37905 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad