IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 217 HARSH KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA ALI MOHAMMAD STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik Surak the petitioner 126, 132, 190, 191, 191(3), 221, 351(3) of Bhara registered at Police (Annexure P- 2. been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) HARSH KUMAR Versus HARYANA (2) ALI MOHAMMAD Versus STATE OF HARYANA Date of decision: September 09 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Siddharth, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Chhina, Sr. DAG, Haryana MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The instant petitions have been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.551, dated 17.10.2024, under Sections 121(1), 132, 190, 191, 191(3), 221, 351(3) of Bhara registered at Police Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra -1). On 07.11.2024, the petitioner been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55318-2024 ...Petitioner ...Respondent CRM-M-61923-2024 ...Petitioner ...Respondent Date of decision: September 09, 2025 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. G.S. Chhina, Sr. DAG, Haryana. been filed under Section 482 of for grant of anticipatory bail to FIR No.551, dated 17.10.2024, under Sections 121(1), 132, 190, 191, 191(3), 221, 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra , the petitioner (in CRM-M-55318-2024) had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation, and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: - ...Petitioner ...Respondent ...Petitioner ...Respondent been filed under Section 482 of for grant of anticipatory bail to FIR No.551, dated 17.10.2024, under Sections 121(1), tiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra had , Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.09 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-55318 Inspector (ASI) in Haryana Police, but there is no such 3. concession of interim bail in order dated 10.12.2024. 4. both the petitioner 10.12.2024 respectively 5. factum of the petitioner investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that are not required for furthe interrogation. 6. interim order dated laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. 7. September 09 Jaspreet Kaur 55318-2024 and CRM-M-61923-2024 “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that although the allegations are that 5-6 persons including the petitioner had assaulted the complainant, who is working as Inspector (ASI) in Haryana Police, but there is no such evidence to show that the complainant had sus much less any grievous injury.” The petitioner (in CRM-M-61923 concession of interim bail in the same terms as in order dated 10.12.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioners have complied with the order dated 10.12.2024 respectively, and joined investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions, factum of the petitioners having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that not required for further investigation, much less for interrogation. In view of the above, the instant petition interim order dated 07.11.2024 is made absolute laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. Copy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case September 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2024 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that although the 6 persons including the petitioner had assaulted the complainant, who is working as Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) in Haryana Police, but there is no such evidence to show that the complainant had sustained any injury 61923-2024) was granted the e same terms as in CRM-M-55318-2024, vide rned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that complied with the order dated 07.11.2024 and and joined investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions, also does not dispute the having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioners r investigation, much less for their custodial instant petitions are disposed of, and is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. Copy of this order be placed on the file of the connected case. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that although the 6 persons including the petitioner had Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) in Haryana Police, but there is no such ained any injury ) was granted the , vide , at the outset, submits that and does not dispute the having joined investigation and cooperated with the s custodial disposed of, and subject to the conditions Jaspreet Kaur 2025.09.09 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh