Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10244 (UTT)

VISHAL SAINI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/1550/2022 · 2025-04-08

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C482 No.1550 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Stuti Pandey, learned counsel i/b Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel present for the applicants. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA present for the State. 3. The matter is shown as defective in the cause list. 4. On 01.09.2022, 23.09.2022, 20.10.2022, 21.11.2022, 13.12.2022 and 13.01.2023, matter was listed before the Registrar (Judicial) for removal of defects. Even after grant of six opportunities, defects were not removed. 5. Thereafter, the matter was listed as defective before the Court on 14.02.2023 but even after lapse of more than three years, the matter is lying defective. 6. From the aforesaid, it can be inferred that the applicants are reluctant to contest the present matter. 7. The Court, thus having left with no option, dismisses the present C482 application for non- compliance of orders passed by this Court. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 08.04.2025 R.Dang