IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74979 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2025 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Lalan Paswan @ Lalan Kumar Paswan S/O Late laljeet Paswan R/O village- Anandpur, P.S-Laxmipur,Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 12-11-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 3 litres of liquor along with 50 kilograms of fermented Jawa Mahua from the house of the petitioner. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and the house in question is a joint family property as such it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was petitioner, who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74979 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 2/3 knowledge and he came to be implicated at the instance of local villagers but then the name of person who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR, which casts an aspersion on the case of prosecution. It is next submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically without proper investigation either through chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret information. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No.215/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 6. It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74979 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 3/3 event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T