CRM-M-53237 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 128 MANJIT SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to investigation 07.06.2025, under Sections 117(2), 118(1), 115(2), 3(5) further to decide representation (Annexure P 2. petitioner has filed the representation dated P-3) before the present petition by issuing directions to the the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 53237-2025 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MANJIT SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate for SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 to investigation of the DDR No.36 dated 25.07.2025 in FIR No.146 dated 07.06.2025, under Sections 117(2), 118(1), 115(2), 3(5) further to decide representation (Annexure P The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the representation dated ) before the respondent No.3. The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53237-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 22.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner to 4 to conduct fair and impartial of the DDR No.36 dated 25.07.2025 in FIR No.146 dated 07.06.2025, under Sections 117(2), 118(1), 115(2), 3(5) of the BNS and further to decide representation (Annexure P-3). counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the representation dated 20.08.2025 (Annexure . The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENT for and impartial of the DDR No.36 dated 25.07.2025 in FIR No.146 dated of the BNS and counsel representing the petitioner submits that the .2025 (Annexure . The learned counsel prays for disposing of to decide GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.22 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-53237 3. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to th representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District Gurdaspur shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat per providing adequate security to him. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 53237-2025 (O&M) 8587 Notice of motion. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to th representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of in is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District Gurdaspur shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to him. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3), by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District Gurdaspur shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of ception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of :Yes/No : Yes/No aforesaid facts, the present petition is to decide the ), by passing a speaking order stant order. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner. The police authority of District Gurdaspur shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of ception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.22 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document