APHC010115232020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7221/2020 Between: 1. MEDASANI BHAVANI PRASAD,, S/O. SUBBARAO, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. FLAT.NO. 401, IDEAL TOWERS, N.T.R.COLONY, TADIGADAPA VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEDANACIRCLE, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEDANA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI T MURALI, S.I. OF POLICE, PEDANA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SRI SRINIVAS, POLICE CONSTABLE, PEDANA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. EDE SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 303, KBC SAVERA, TADIGADAPA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7221 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Police Authorities in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful life and enjoyment and harassing and confining the petitioner in the police station by saying that they will foist case against him as illegal and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful life and enjoyment by any manner and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri K. Rambabu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful life and enjoyment and confining the petitioner in the police station saying that they will foist case against him. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful life and enjoyment. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7221 of 2020 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 179