HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22474 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. HON'BLE MRS. GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Gaurav Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri K.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the FIR dated 23.08.2025 in Case Crime No. 36 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 319(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Rajpura, District-Sambhal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that offences, complained of, are punishable only up to seven years and therefore, before effecting the arrest of the petitioners, specific provisions contained in Sections 35(3) to 35(7) of Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 be strictly complied with in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in several judgments. 4. We have perused the FIR, which prima facie discloses cognizable offences against the petitioners and therefore, the prayer made to quash the FIR cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, we are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all the offences, complained of in the impugned FIR, are punishable with a term up to seven years, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Keshari Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mahendra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) therefore, in case of effecting the arrest of the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned FIR, it is directed that the respondents/ authorities shall ensure that the specific provisions contained in Section 41(1)(b) and Section 41-A of CrPC/Section 35(3) to 35(7) of Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the guidelines issued by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as the directions issued in judgement and order dated 28.01.2021 of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others) reported in 2021 (2) ACR 1147, be strictly complied with. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. October 6, 2025 MH CRLP No. 22474 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Garima Prashad,J.) (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad