MANAGING COMMITTEE EIDGAH TH CHAIRMAN KARAMAT MALIK AND OTHERS v. MOHD SADIQ MALIK AND OTHERS
RSA/24/2024 · 2025-10-29
Rahul Bharti
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10240 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10240 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA No. 24/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RSA No. 24/2024 CM No. 7653/2024 CM No. 5533/2025
Date of pronouncement : 29.10.2025
Uploaded on : 03.11.2025
Managing Committee Eidgah Darhal & Ors.
….Petitioners
Through:- Mr. Zahid Sarfraz Malik, Advocate.
V/s
Mohd. Sadiq Malik & Ors.
…..Respondents
Through:- Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-7 to 9.
\
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
01. In the name of the Managing Committee, Eidgah Darhal, purportedly acting through its Chairman, namely, Karamat Malik, joined by seven other residents of tehsil Darhal of different villages initiated a civil suit on file No. 120/Civil of the court of learned Sub-Judge (Special Mobile Magistrate), Rajouri on 23.12.2017, thereby seeking a declaration with consequent relief/s. Serial No. 17
RSA No. 24/2024
02. The suit came to be held not maintainable for want of proper notice under section 820 of the J&K Code of Civil Produce, Svt., 1977 in terms of order dated 12.11.2024.
03. Against said dismissal of the suit, the plaintiffs preferred a civil 1st appeal before the court of learned Additional District Judge, Rajouri on file No. 09/Civil Appeal which came to be disposed of on 18.12.2024 by confirming the original court order dated 12.11.2024.
04. The plaintiffs are now in present civil 2nd appeal before this Court against the aforesaid outcome of a civil suit.
05. This Court finds no illegality in the original order dated 12.11.2024 passed by the court of learned Sub-Judge (Special Mobile Magistrate), Rajouri holding the suit non- maintainable for want of proper notice under section 80 of the J&K Code of Civil Produce, Svt., 1977, as such, this appeal is dismissed alongwith connected applications.
06. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
29.10.2025
Bunty
Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes/No Whether the judgment is reportable: Yes/No
Bunty Kumar 2025.11.03 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu