Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1024 (ORI)

BIPIN BIHARI SAMANTARAY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/36509/2025 · 2026-01-05

Dixit K S

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.36509 of 2025 Bipin Bihari Samantaray …. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Jena, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.B. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD Order No. 01. ORDER 05.01.2026 In the representation dated 07.04.2025, a copy whereof avails at Annexure-6, Petitioner has requested the Director of Secondary Education, Odisha for sanction and disbursement of differential arrears of salary that has accrued due during the period between April, 1992 and July, 2011, which is quantified in sum of Rs.7,29,638/- (Seven Lakh Twenty-Nine Thousand & Six Hundred Thirty-Eight Only), which figure is mentioned in the representation itself. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that without deciding merits of the matter, if a direction is issued to consider the subject representation in accordance with law and in a time bound way, justice would be meted out to his client. 3. Learned AGA-Mr. Mohanty appearing for the OPs in his usual fairness submits that if the Petitioner cooperates by furnishing necessary information and document, there would be no difficulty for taking a decision on the subject representation in a time bound way, provided that all contentions are kept open. With this proposal of the learned AGA, counsel for the Petitioner is agreeable. In the above circumstances, writ petition is disposed off. Time for consideration of the subject representation and informing result of such consideration to the Petitioner in writing is, eight weeks. All contentions are kept open. The consideration should happen keeping in view the endorsement by the District Education Officer, Kendrapara issued to the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide letter dated 13.07.2023, a copy whereof avails at Annexure-1. It is open to the answering Opposite Parties to solicit any information or documents from the side of the Petitioner, as required for taking a decision on the subject representation. However, in that guise delay shall not be brooked. Now, no costs. Web copy of this order to be acted upon by all concerned. ( Dixit Krishna Shripad ) Judge Madhusmita Designation: Jr. Stenographer