HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8037 of 2025 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Biswajeet Mukherjee, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Lal Prabhakar Singh, and perused the record. 2. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0159 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 190, 191(3), 333, 351(3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Junawai, District Sambhal with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and she has an apprehension that she may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicant as there are general and omnibus allegations against the applicant. It is further submitted that as per the FIR 10 named accused persons including the applicant are said to have assaulted the informant side as a result of which 5 persons received injury but none of the injuries received by any of the injured are dangerous to life. It is submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and she would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, she shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Biswajeet Mukherjee Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Lal Prabhakar Singh Rambeti .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. and Sri Lal Prabhakar, learned counsel for the first informant has opposed the application for anticipatory bail. Learned AGA submits that one of the injuries each of injured Narayan and Udai Veer has been kept under observations. 5. I have considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. 6. As per first information report, 10 named accused persons including the applicant are said to have assaulted the first informant side as a result of which 5 persons of the first informant side are said to have received injuries but none of the injuries received by the injured is said to have dangerous to life. There is no specific allegation agaisnt the applicant and only general allegations are levelled against the applicant. The applicant is having no criminal history. 7. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration. 8. In the instant case, considering the settled principle of law regarding anticipatory bail, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, nature of accusation, role of applicant and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. 9. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 10. In the event of arrest of the applicant- Rambeti involved in the aforesaid case crime, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :- NABAIL No. 8037 of 2025 2 (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that she would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail. (iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned. 11. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant herein. October 13, 2025 Abhishek NABAIL No. 8037 of 2025 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad