Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2041] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6272/2006
1. Shyokaran Ram Saini S/o Shri Mamraj Saini, aged 80 years,
2. Balu Ram Saini S/o Shri Shyokaran, aged 45 years,
3. Chhaju Ram Saini S/o Shri Bhola Ram, aged 60 years All R/o Dhani Bhivrajwala ki Tan Papurana, Tehsil Khetri Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
4. Durga Prasad Darji S/o Shri Hardeva Ram, aged 82 years, R/o Tan Papurana, Tehsil Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu.
5. Gariba S/o Shri Bhola Bux, aged 30 years, R/o Tan Papurana, Tehsil Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Forest and Environment Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Director, Geological Survey and Mines Department, Government of Rajasthan, Udaipur.
4. The Secretary, Rajasthan Pollution Control Board, Jhalana Doongari, Jaipur.
5. The District Collector, Jhunjhunu.
6. The Sub-Division Officer, Khetri Distt. Jhunjhunu.
7. The Tehsildar, Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu.
8. Shri Suresh Kumar Kanodia, Proprietor of M/s. Laxmi Store Crusher, Post Papurana, Tehsil Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.M.Ranjan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rohan Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Akhil Simlote with Mr.Dikshant Jain Mr.Shubham Gupta for Mr.Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order 15/01/2025
1. This petition was filed seeking directions to the respondents to decide representation of the petitioner dated 13.07.2006.
[2025:RJ-JP:2041] (2 of 2) [CW-6272/2006]
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions submits that the grievance raised by the petitioner has been redressed to an extent.
3. Without commenting upon merits of the matter, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents to decide representation of the petitioner annexed with this writ petition expeditiously in accordance with law within six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. The petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law if aggrieved of the decision.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/Riya/25