HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34788 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the prayer during course of the day. 2. Heard Sri Bharat Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Roshan Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 143 of 2025, Case No.13803 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 110 B.N.S., Police Station- Dataganj, District Budaun. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though in the FIR, allegations have been made against the applicant along with his father for beating mercilessly to the injured Neelam for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry but all the injuries are simple in nature except one injury which is fracture in fimer. It is further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 24.04.2025 and he has been falsely implicated. Charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that prior to lodging of the FIR in question, another FIR was lodged by the injured victim for harassment due to demand of dowry. On compromising with the injured, who is wife of the applicant, injured did not pursue the earlier case and the same is pending before the trial court, therefore, the incident in question was again occurred in which the victim Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas Rathore .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Neelam was beaten mercilessly by the applicant with iron rod in which she received 23 serious injuries including fracture in fimer. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taken into account the victim earlier lodged an FIR against the applicant and his family members for harassment over demand of dowry and after compromise, they again started harassing the victim and beaten mercilessly and she received 23 serious injuries. Therefore, in such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 6. Accordingly, the present application is rejected. October 9, 2025 A.Kr. BAIL No. 34788 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad